Customer Reviews
...all the elements of a great family-friendly film are here in
full force.
62 people found this review helpful.
Ever wish Narnia or Middle Earth were real? Or that you really
could sit down to coffee with Jo March or Anne of Green Gables?
What if anything you read came out of the book and into your
world?
People with this gift exist in Inkheart. They're called
Silvertongues, and some of them don't even know they have this
ability, like Mo Folchart (Brendan Fraser). One night when he reads
from a novel called Inkheart to his wife and three-year-old
daughter, more than one villainous character suddenly appears out
of the book, and his wife suddenly disappears into the book.
Mo has never read aloud again, and for nine years he's searched
tirelessly for another rare copy of Inkheart in the hopes that
somehow he can read his wife back out. His daughter Meggie (Eliza
Bennett) is now twelve and travels Europe with her father, a
bookbinder, from bookstore to bookstore. She doesn't know why her
Mom abandoned them. She doesn't even know what her father's
searching for. But she soon finds out when a strange man named
Dustfinger confronts Mo, demanding to be read back into Inkheart.
The adventure soon takes both of them into the wilds of Italy, and
along the way they make friends and enemies, discovering more than
they wish about themselves and the magic of Inkheart.
Based on a novel by Cornelia Funke, Inkheart is a wonderful tribute
to the power of story and the love of reading. It's hard to see why
its been lambasted by many critics, because all the elements of a
great family-friendly film are here in full force. Its reverence
for books shows kids that reading is magical and books are to be
treasured. The fantasy adventure taps into a thriving market that's
already been developed by Harry Potter and Narnia.
Inkheart features several noteworthy actors and actresses. Brendan
Fraser is of course the quintessential action/adventure dude from
the Mummy movies and Walden Media's Journey to the Center of the
Earth. Helen Mirren as cranky and sarcastic Great-Aunt Elinor is
brilliant (The movie's worth watching for her scenes alone.)
Villain Capricorn is played by none other than the guy who brought
us Gollum in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Jim Broadbent (The
Professor in The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe) as Fenoglio,
the author of the novel Inkheart in the movie, is thoroughly
convincing as a curmudgeon writer in awe that his characters have
come to life before him. Hardly the cast of a flop.
Why aren't we hearing more about this movie? Sure, there are a few
minor continuity guffaws that'll have you scratching your head,
like one minute it's day in a scene, the next minute the sun is
setting. But this is a forgivable offense and found in many box
office hits.
Maybe Inkheart veers too far from the novel upon which its based.
It's been said big changes were made. Could this really account for
the lack of ticket sales? We might never know. But even if you've
never read the book, there's much to enjoy in the movie. With a
strong theme of familial love and enough humor to crack up the
room, it's amazing Inkheart is being lost in the shuffle. Let's
hope it's the sleeper that becomes a DVD hit.
--Reviewed by C.J. Darlington for TitleTrakk
Inkheartproduct
5
Off the Page and Into Reality
26 people found this review helpful.
Some have criticized "Inkheart" for sending the wrong message about
reading, as if it was warning children that opening a book will
lead to disastrous results. I saw it differently; to me, "Inkheart"
sends a wonderful message about the imagination of writers and the
power they have to create and/or destroy entire worlds. When the
forces of evil become overpowering, the writer regains control with
a few strokes of a pen (or, more modernly, a few clicks on a
keyboard). Far be it from me to want to sound corny, but as a
writer myself, I respond well to stories that are about stories.
Based on the German novel by Cornelia Funke, "Inkheart" is creative
and fun, a fantasy about fantasy becoming reality. It tells the
story of Mortimer Folchart (Brendan Fraser), a father who possesses
the ability to bring forth characters from books simply by reading
aloud. But there's a catch: If someone from the story crosses over
into our world, then someone from our world has to cross over into
the story.
Such a thing happened to Mortimer's beloved wife, Risa, as he was
reading from the pages of a novel called "Inkheart." Nine years
later, he and his twelve-year-old daughter, Meggie (Eliza Bennett),
continue to search the world for a copy of that book, which has
long since gone out of print. If he can find one, he'll finally be
able to read his wife out of the story. He and Meggie finally find
one in a quaint bookshop in the middle of Italy. It's there that
they run into Dustfinger (Paul Bettany), a juggler who has the
ability to start fires with his own hands. As it turns out, he's a
character from "Inkheart," and he's spent the last nine years
following Mortimer with the hope that he can get him back into the
story.
Here enters Mortimer's aunt, Elinor Loredan (Helen Mirren), a
snooty bookworm who dresses like Norma Desmond and lives in an
isolated sprawling palazzo. She, Mortimer, and Meggie are kidnapped
by the henchmen of the evil Capricorn (Andy Serkis), the villain of
"Inkheart." His dastardly plot: Have Mortimer read aloud from
"Inkheart" to summon The Shadow, a frightening monstrosity made
from smoke and ashes. Capricorn's attempts to bring forth other
literary creations have been unsuccessful; his reader, who has the
same power as Mortimer, has a terrible stutter. The result is
half-materialized creatures, unfinished lines of text written
across their bodies. With the help of the author of "Inkheart" (Jim
Broadbent), one of the Forty Thieves (Rafi Gavron), and a mute
scullery maid (Sienna Guillory), Mortimer and Meggie set forth on a
quest to restore everything to the way it's supposed to be.
The magic of this movie comes not from the digital effects or the
elaborate settings, although both are quite impressive. It comes
from the clever plot, the wonderful use of imagination, and
characterization. This isn't to suggest that the characters are any
more than fairy tale archetypes; heroes, villains, damsels in
distress, wise elders, and comedy relief all contribute to the
story in one form or another. Still, there's a complexity to
certain characters that makes them more engaging. Take, for
example, Dustfinger--he's a decent enough person at heart, but his
circumstances often times lead him down a desperate, sometimes
cowardly path. His only motivation is to return within the pages of
"Inkheart" to be with his family (his wife, Roxanne, is seen only
in brief glimpses and is played by Bettany's real-life wife,
Jennifer Connelly). And the fact that he's afraid to meet the
book's author made perfect sense; Dustfinger has never read
"Inkheart" all the way through because he doesn't want to know his
fate. When Meggie asks him why, he responds, "Do you know how your
story ends?"
I also appreciated the references made to well-known works of
fiction, most notably L. Frank Baum's "The Wonderful Wizard of Oz,"
which plays a very important role midway through the film, when the
good guys attempt to escape from Capricorn's castle. I love the
idea that a written fantasy could be freed from the page and used
as a weapon against the forces of evil. It makes for a level of
excitement I rarely feel. What's even more exciting is the fact
that the exact same forces of evil can also use the written word as
a weapon; at that point, survival depends on being able to expand
on the author's original vision. To say more would give too much
away, but rest assured that anyone able to appreciate the act of
writing will find the ending of "Inkheart" very satisfying.
I will not go so far as to say that it's an original story. I will
say, however, that it works with what it has got very well. It's
always a pleasure to see a film that appreciates the art of
storytelling, which I personally feel is one of the greatest gifts
we as people can share with one another. I have so much respect for
writers; they create entire worlds and inhabit them with characters
that are not always relatable, but are usually fascinating just the
same. Not all will agree, but I feel that "Inkheart" is a film that
celebrates the author and the worlds he or she creates. It's a pure
delight from beginning to end, fun, exciting, and magical--exactly
what I wanted to see.
Inkheartproduct
4
Fair fantasy flick
23 people found this review helpful.
Have you ever become so immersed in a book that it seemed to come
to life?
Suppose it really did. That premise underlies this enchanted
fantasy story. I have to admit, the movie's basic passion for the
written word spoke to something inside me. So did the libraries of
whispering books, which brought to life something that had only
been metaphorically real for me before, and so did the girl with
her own zeal for reading and aspirations toward writing. I have to
admit, I was somewhat tickled to see the best of today's movie
making effect-meisters putting so much effort into this tribute to
the low tech pleasure of reading.
Given that magical beginning, the story might have become more -
but drew me along anyway. The characters never wholly engaged me,
though. Even Helen Mirren couldn't quite give her character the
drive I might have hoped for. To tell the truth, I was happy to see
the effects kick in toward the second half of the movie, to give me
visually what the plot wasn't offering.
I have to admit, I haven't read the book. It seems to have a loyal
following, and loyal readers often express disappointment in how
their favored scenes and characters appear on the screen. I had the
luxury of judging the movie on its own merits, so I generally
enjoyed it. Although a bit much for skittish small children, it's a
kid-friendly fantasy - and one that works against the view that
reading is for nerds.
-- wiredweird, reviewing the theatrical release
Inkheartproduct
4
Don't bother
27 people found this review helpful.
I was surprised to see so many positive reviews for this movie.
From a description of the plot line, it would seem like this movie
would be full of fantastic creatures and an adventurous story.
Instead, the story is painfully one dimensional and loaded with
inconsistencies and fallacies. I will not give a plot summary here
as others have done that better than I could.
Thumbs Up
* Makeup and costumes were excellent.
* I read another review that criticized the special effects, but I
thought they were great.
* The stylization is consistent and creates an interesting
mood.
Thumbs Down
* A story loaded with holes and inconsistencies
* I wasn't attached to the characters. I thought the little girl
was irritating and Brendan Frazer's actions were so erratic and
nonsensical that he never truly caught my interest. Their story
never really drew me in as an audience member.
Inconsistencies
* Brendan Frazer's character claimed he never read the girl any
stories, yet she knows quite a few characters from literature.
* Why does the girl have a British accent? She's been raised by an
American father.
* In the middle of the movie, the characters decide to go to the
author's house to see if he has an additional copy.... really?...
they didn't think of this in the 9 years they've been
searching??
* Brendan Frazer's distrust of dustfingers in the beginning of the
movie doesn't make any sense. There is no disincentive to teaming
up.
* The characters realize that whatever the people with the "gift"
read comes to life so they decide to read things that they want to
happen. I have a hard time believing they wouldn't have come to
that conclusion a little earlier.
* Lighting the castle on fire in the end was completely
unnecessary
* They make it a point to drive to the Great Aunt's house. In fact,
the Brendan Frazer character said "we NEED to get there". Yet there
was absolutely no purpose in them going there. Great Aunt was
really no help and there was absolutely no need to go there.
I don't believe this movie will necessarily motivate/not-motivate
children to read. Even if the net effect of this movie were
positive, there are other "pro reading" movies that do the same
thing significantly better.
Inkheartproduct
2
What a romp through space and time! WOW
4 people found this review helpful.
Inkheart was quite a surprise for me. I was not sure from the movie
title if the film would be worth watching, but after watching it, I
have to say it's one of the best fantasy films I've seen in quite
awhile! The acting is superb, the story line is marvelous, and the
creativity present in the story development was wonderful. There's
plenty of action, some very interesting twists, and a great
outcome. I felt good after watching this film, and excited to share
it with friends. It kept me guessing every step of the way. Awesome
film ... one I will watch again and again!
Inkheartproduct
5
Not as good as the book, but ok.
3 people found this review helpful.
This movie was kind of a disappointment really. The characters were
weak and sort of dumb. It lacked the depth that the book has. One
of my biggest annoyances is that Basta is supposed to be scary, but
he's sort of a dork. That was one of the things about the book. The
characters were incredibly and even unnecessarily evil and the
movie just didn't pull that off. Also, by changing the story around
Resa they turned Dustfinger into a selfish coward. Granted, he was
selfish, but he wasn't that bad. Also, the reading was too
controlled. It should have been unpredictable. Well, I could go on
for a while, but I won't bore you. There were just so many things
that turned the story from good to mediocre.
In it's defense, the story wasn't terrible, just not what I was
expecting. The acting was good as well as the special effects and I
do think they did a pretty good job with Capricorn's character. If
I had seen it without reading the book I might have liked it, but I
can't be sure because I did read the book and I know what it should
have been like.
My advice is: Read the book.
Inkheartproduct
3
Intriguing Concept, Disappointing Screenplay
3 people found this review helpful.
The premise of "Inkheart" is intriguing: certain persons have a
special gift -- when they read aloud, they bring characters of
fiction into the real world. The downside: for every fictional
character who comes into the real world, a real human being is
taken into the fictional world.
Mo Folchart (Brendan Fraser), a book buyer and restorer, has this
ability, and is stalked by a mysterious figure as he and daughter
Meggie (Eliza Hope Bennett) browse through an open-air book market.
The stranger is Dustfinger (Paul Bettany), a fictional character Mo
brought into the real world years earlier who longs to return to
his family in the pages of "Inkheart," a now rare, out-of-print
book. When Dustfinger appeared in our world, Mo's wife, Resa
(Sienna Guillory), disappeared into the book's world.
The plot is essentially a quest in which assorted characters
combine forces, meet others along the way, and dedicate themselves
to a mutually beneficial goal. Of course, as with all quests, this
won't be easy. There's a group of fictional folks, under the
leadership of Capricorn (Andy Serkis), who've made a very nice life
for themselves in the real world, taken up residence in a hillside
castle, and have no intention of returning to their fictional
world.
Brendan Fraser seems to be the go-to guy for movie fantasies (think
"The Mummy" franchise and last summer's "Journey to the Center of
the Earth"). He has always seemed to me a grown-up with boy-like
wonderment. What he lacks in acting chops, he makes up for in
earnestness, knowing that at any second this fantasy can degenerate
into camp.
This does actually happen with the character of Elinor Lordan
(Helen Mirren), Mo's aunt, an eccentric, turban-wearing book
collector who speaks her mind with little regard for others'
feelings. Initially, the character is used to move the plot along.
She disappears for a long time and reappears in the movie's final
third, speeding up the mountainside on a motorbike and later riding
a unicorn into a sanitized battle pitting the forces of good
against evil. It's difficult to accept the sophisticated Ms. Mirren
as this exaggerated caricature.
Bettany, who is best remembered as the imaginary friend of John
Nash in "A Beautiful Mind," conveys appropriate menace in the
film's early scenes, but also a wistfulness -- even a sadness --
because of his entrapment in a world that's not his own.
Bennett plays Meggie not as a starry-eyed innocent but as a mature,
intelligent young woman. Her Meggie is not just along for the ride.
She participates in decision making, is in the midst of the action
rather than on the sidelines, and exhibits many qualities of the
movie heroine. She helps shore up the proceedings with her
down-to-earth, focused performance.
Even with the fantasy element, the movie limps along, predictable
all the way. We've seen cinema fantasies that are far more
effective. "The Wizard of Oz" still enchants viewers after all
these years (there's an interesting homage to that classic in
"Inkheart," incidentally). "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory"
was the movie without equal for a whole generation. More recently,
the "Harry Potter" movies have shown how a solid script, engaging
characters, and state-of-the-art special effects can combine to
produce genuinely thrilling fantasy adventures.
Rated PG, "Inkheart" builds to an anticipated climax, but loses
dramatic steam before the final credits roll.
Inkheartproduct
2
A decent adaptation of the book
3 people found this review helpful.
Although I didn't really like the book, I actually enjoyed the
movie. I was expecting the same far too long escape and recapture
scenes between Mo and Capricorn, many of which were still there but
significantly shortened. There were plenty of changes to the movie,
especially at the end, but overall, I think they were an
improvement to the original story. My favorite aspects, however,
were the camera effects and the soundtrack.
-Lindsey Miller, www.lindseyslibrary.com
Inkheartproduct
3
Inkheart needed more ink
3 people found this review helpful.
I think that this movie did a good job at its purpose which is to
entertain. I would have liked more understanding as to the "Whys"
and "Hows" of things, and I believe that the movie could have been
longer with more depth. Do not try to tell me that the Fantasy
Movies for kids need to be 90 minutes. Look at the Harry Potter
series, all hitting about 2 hours a pop. If the movie is engaging,
length and depth are not an issue. Still, this was entertaining and
enjoyable for the family from a group that did not read the book
before hand. And the bonus feature of the actress reading a chapter
not even in the movie? that was a waste of space in my opinion.
Inkheartproduct
4
Just Your Average Fantasy Adventure
5 people found this review helpful.
Mortimer "Mo" Folchart (Brendan Fraser) makes his living as a
repairer of old books. He and his daughter Meggie (Eliza Bennett)
travel all over Europe stopping in antiquated bookshops. And in
each one, Mo searches the entire collection for one book in
particular, Inkheart.
Mo finally finds a copy, but just after he does, he is confronted
by Dustfinger (Paul Bettany), one of the characters from the novel.
Mo manages to run away, and he and Meggie flee to great aunt
Elinor's (Helen Mirren) in Italy. But they aren't safe there.
Dustfinger appears again, says he is working with Capricorn (Andy
Serkis) now, and kidnaps the three of them.
Only when the group reaches Capricorn's castle does Mo explain what
is happening. Seems he is a Silvertongue and has the ability to
read characters into and out of books. Dustfinger and Capricorn are
characters in Inkheart, but Mo wants to find a copy for a very
personal reason. What do the characters want? Can Mo and his family
escape?
The previews for this movie made it seem like I would love it.
Heck, as a reader, the premise of characters traveling between a
novel and the real world appeals to me. But the movie just seemed
off to me.
And it's mainly a matter of expectations. I expected lots of
references to characters from famous novels. There are some, but
the main focus is on the characters from the book in question. I
expected a fast paced action story. Yes, there were action scenes,
but there were also long passages between them where the story
moved forward rather slowly.
I did find myself getting lost in the story. The acting was top
notch, and the special effects were jaw dropping. Heck, even the
cinematography held impressive shots of lakes and castles.
A word of warning to parents. There are some frightening creatures
and intense action sequences, including the climax. You might want
to preview it before your let your young kids watch it, especially
those who frighten easily.
I half expected to rush out and read the books after I caught this
in the theater, and that still hasn't happened. If you watch the
film, you'll enjoy it, but there's not reason to rush out to do so.
Inkheartproduct
3